Commonwealth does democracy in…again

The brainwashed old Ostrich adds its own feather to the General’s cap

Becoming a certified democracy just got easier. Mount a coup, rewrite the constitution (if any), criminalise ordinary politicians, legitimise extremist ones, shamelessly rig the odd referendum and continue to nurture terrorists — all you need to do to get certified by the old Ostrich is to seek the support of your own handpicked parliament. Provided, that is, you are certified ally in the War against Terror.

This is the story of the Commonwealth’s stand on General Musharraf’s desire to publicly two-time Pakistan. Only a brainwashed old ostrich, perhaps a brain-dead one, could seriously describe Musharraf’s attempts to entrench the dictatorship as democracy as long as parliament approves it. As is its wont, the old Ostrich conveniently ignored its own observation that all candidates were required to accept Musharraf’s changes to the constitution before they were allowed to stand for election.

6. The Group noted the conclusions and recommendations of the COG Report, including its assessment that certain measures introduced in the period preceding the elections have had a limiting effect on the process of restoring democracy. CMAG called upon the Government of Pakistan to take necessary steps to implement the recommendations of the Report related to institutional and procedural issues. The Group expressed concern over the continued promulgation of new laws, even after the elections, which follow extra-constitutional measures introduced through the Legal Framework Order 2002.

8. CMAG agreed to maintain the status quo on Pakistan’s suspension from the Councils of the Commonwealth pending greater clarity and an assessment of the role and functioning of democratic institutions. [Commonwealth in Nov 2002]

Ayaz Amir, who can tell the difference between democracy and dictatorship, mixes helplessness with optimism when he writes that Musharraf’s double role will unite political parties opposed to Musharraf.

Hence the supreme paradox: democracy’s cause will be served if Musharraf remains in uniform. For that, under the circumstances, is the only thing likely to galvanize the opposition parties and shake them out of their torpor. Conversely, if he redeems his uniform pledge, the neither-here-nor-there political system foisted upon the country gets another lease of life.

So the last favour that Pakistanis could ask of their president: please keep wearing your uniform. [Dawn/Archive]

But The Economist is perhaps closer to the mark when it writes that a confrontation between Musharraf and the Mullah MPs will just push Pakistan further towards the brink.

The “Islamic blowback” manifests itself daily in suicide bombings and sectarian warfare. Top army and civilian leaders, especially General Musharraf and the new prime minister, Shaukat Aziz, remain prime assassination targets. A nationalist insurgency is brewing in Baluchistan province, where gas pipelines are routinely attacked. The campaign to flush out foreign terrorists hiding in the tribal areas of Pakistan has taken a heavy toll of soldiers and alienated local tribesmen. Jobs are hard to find and inflation is rearing its head. If the general breaks his promise and picks a fight with the opposition, next year could bring Pakistan more, not less, instability. [The Economist]

Related Link: Pakistan’s Daily Times has two editorials on the parliament and the Commonwealth’s stand.

6 thoughts on “Commonwealth does democracy in…again”

  1. Pingback: Desi Pundit...
  2. The commonwealth doesn’t really matter does it?
    But all this talk of an islamic blowback etc is heartwarming indeed. Pak’s bad karma comes back to haunt it…hee hee, can barely hide my glee at the prospect. I’m openly rooting for civil war in pakistan. Its the only way Pakistan can be split into manageable parts and normal relations can just about be possible with these components individually.
    Sure, ordinary decent folk will suffer if anarchy descends but remember these are the same ordinary decent folk who support jihad in kashmir, who condoned suicide terrorism as long as it was in India (remember Kaluchak, Akshardham etc) and who may outwardly profess peacenik avatars but who inwardly hate India. Sure, one could always excuse their small minded behaviour saying its not their fault – their textbooks indoctrinated them to hate India from the beginning etc…. You only have to look at Ayaz Amir who lietrally clenches his teeth while having to mention Indiia in the remotest positive light in any of his columns…

    To me these are just words. Pak’s destruction by internal collapse would be optimal for India. It maybe sagacious to pretend otherwise but it would be foolish to wish so.

  3. Yes, insurgencies popping up in Pak does sound like poetic justice but we must remember that we get what we give. We propped up insurgencies in East Pakistan – the new nation we helped form has turned out to be a snake waiting to bite us. We built the LTTE too. Of course our reasons would have been far more justified, but the general Paki(West or East) would believe the same about their respective reasons too.

  4. Pingback: Simon World

Comments are closed.