Nick gets it right

But what about Sam?

Eric points to an excellent op-ed by Nicholas Kristof on the harassment of Mukhtaran Mai

Excuse me, but Ms. Mukhtaran, a symbol of courage and altruism, is the best hope for Pakistan’s image. The threat to Pakistan’s image comes from President Musharraf for all this thuggish behavior.

I’ve been sympathetic to Mr. Musharraf till now, despite his nuclear negligence, partly because he’s cooperated in the war on terrorism and partly because he has done a good job nurturing Pakistan’s economic growth, which in the long run is probably the best way to fight fundamentalism. So even when Mr. Musharraf denied me visas all this year, to block me from visiting Ms. Mukhtaran again and writing a follow-up column, I bit my tongue.

But now President Musharraf has gone nuts.

“This is all because they think they have the support of the U.S. and can get away with murder,” Ms. Jahangir said. Indeed, on Friday, just as all this was happening, President Bush received Pakistan’s foreign minister in the White House and praised President Musharraf’s “bold leadership.” [NYT]

Kristof gets it right. Thanks to the efforts of a group of Pakistani-Americans, the matter is receiving greater attention in the United States. But given the Bush administration’s investment in the Musharraf-good-boy story, it will be hard pressed to be anything beyond ‘dismayed‘. America’s total support for Gen Musharraf and his dispensation done nothing to change the fundamentally thuggish nature of his intelligence apparatus. Generous Americans may contribute to Mukhtaran Mai’s brave struggle, but it is within the power of their government to make a meaningful change. As they open their hearts and wallets, they must also press their leaders go beyond mere lip-service.

4 thoughts on “Nick gets it right”

  1. Pingback: Dark Days Ahead...
  2. Nitin,

    The NYT followed it up with an editorial today. Unfortunately, the Bush administration has shown little inclination to respond to concerns raised by several influential publications and individuals about Musharraf’s dodgy role as a putative ally. So invested are they in the butcher of Kargil that they are almost dismissive of evidence to the contrary. They seem convinced that the only alternative in Pakistan would be a jihadi outfit in control of the nukes – a nightmare scenario. Sadly, their “trust” in the dictator du-jour can only lead to a realization of what they are trying to avoid.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/15/opinion/15wed1.html?

  3. Vijay,

    I wish I could disagree with you but I can not. While I think the problem is complex the US and this administration must put more pressure on Pakistan to liberalize and move back to a democracy. Unfortunately I don’t think we have seen anything like that nor will we any time soon. Its very disappointing and I think in the long run it hurts our efforts fighting terrorism.

Comments are closed.