Fighting Naxalites with loose fists

India’s latest attempt to tackle the Naxalite menace demonstrates lack of central leadership

In the last few years, various groups of Left-wing terrorists across India and Nepal have demonstrated an unprecedented tendency towards coordination, cooperation and collaboration. And in the past year, various groups and factions of Naxalites and Maoists have consolidated under a single umbrella — that of the Communist Party of India (Maoist). And in the same one year, Dr Manmohan Singh’s central government has shown little urgency in fashioning any sort of a coordinated response. And the latest pow-wow of several Maoist-affected state chief ministers hosted by Shivraj Patil, the Union Home Minister, failed to throw up concrete plans to tackle the Maoist menace.

It was decided that each state will form a separate task-force with every other state that it shares a border with. That means that a state like Jharkhand, characterised by poor governance, inadequate law and order resources and high levels of Naxalite activity will have to form as many as five separate task-forces, one with each its neighbouring states. What’s more, the formation of joint task forces is non-binding, and poor Jharkhand cannot do much if one of its neighbours decides against constituting one.

The missing element in the entire arrangement is the role of the centre — the consolidated challenge posed by the Maoists demands a consolidated response. Shivraj Patil’s home ministry has been characterised by complacence, ineptitude and dangerous irresponsibility as far as the Naxalite menace is concerned. His latest announcement is doubly dangerous — not only does it fail to throw up a meaningful challenge to the spread of Maoist terror, it creates an illusion that the central and state governments are working together. They are not. They are just busy forming committees, task forces and ‘distributing’ development funds.

3 thoughts on “Fighting Naxalites with loose fists”

  1. The one fact that all the media seems to conveniently forget is that a lot of the Naxal gangs are hand in glove with local politicians either due to ideology, common ends, monetary benefits or even coercion.

    There was no other reason for YSR Reddy to having called off the manhunt against Naxals in AP. But he did. He has a shady background as does most of his party in the state. Pressure from Naxals who helped him get elected resulted in them being given enough time to regroup and strike back. The naxalite movement needs to be made a national outcast and hunted don but instead it recieves tacit support from ganglords and politicians in return for carrying out vendetta killings. The government at the Centre knows this, the normally vocal anti America communists are strangely quiet on this issue perhaps displaying support for their violent comrades.

    Isn’t there a need for a complete change of direction then?

  2. The complacency is because of an inherent bias towards left wing or socialistic activities in Indian establishment. If something is claimed to be socialistic, it has the sympathy of intellectuals, the government, and the bureaucracy and is treated as social and political problem, not as a terrorist problem. That’s why AP CM YSR was able start his failed negotiations with AP naxalites, with full support of Indian media and intelligentsia, although the people on the other side of the table almost assassinated his predecessor just few months prior. There is no hope tackling this left-wing terrorism until the perspective of the establishment changes.

  3. Pingback: The Moderate Voice

Comments are closed.