Can someone get him out of minstry pelase!! Or stop him from mouting those platidues about “we must maintain calm…all the culprits will be caught”… what a sissy.

“Sarabjit’s and Afzal Guru’s cases are similar in the sense that each is considered innocent in the other country. It is easy to see the parallel.”

Lets get some facts straight. Sarabjit is an Indian who is sentenced to death in Pakistan. Afzal Guru is an Indian who is sentenced to death in India.

Unless, of course, you believe that Kashmir is a part of Pakistan – which, we “communalists” do not believe so, and will not let it happen!

“Probably reached the end of the road for logical arguments.”

Problem is that it did NOT begin with any logical argument. Nilu muttered some mumbo-jumbo about ternary solutions in a quadruple space governed by quintuple parameters, but did not otherwise offer any logical argument.

Let us see if he will respond to the course correction I’m attempting.

“In other words, I don’t have an argument — I am just saying Nitin’s is invalid”

You are wrong. To claim that Nitin’s argument is invalid, is also an argument. Furthermore, you are not able to buttress this argument with solid reason, except repeat yourself ad nauseum. Let’s see if you can proceed in a logical manner to prove your argument. You need to begin by answering the question I put to you above.

“My point is simple — Patil simply stated a fact.”

I don’t find your argument convincing. It is bereft of logic and reason. Home ministers don’t state random “facts”. Patil has not said, for example, that “cow eats grass and yields milk”, which is also a fact. When the home minster states a “fact”, he has got to be making a point using that “fact”. What is the point Patil is making here?

Let us start with it and see how it leads or doesn’t lead to a moral equivalence.

And, where is that Atanu? Is he on his way to ask his refund?

Stop repeating yourself. You’ve said what you wanted to say.