<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INS Tabar sinks pirate ship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/</link>
	<description>The Education of an Opinionated Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:47:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pirates of the Mediterranean &#124; DesiPundit</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-125275</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirates of the Mediterranean &#124; DesiPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-125275</guid>
		<description>[...] Indian Navy is hunting pirates near Somalia, this would be a good time to listen to a pirate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indian Navy is hunting pirates near Somalia, this would be a good time to listen to a pirate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pragmatic Euphony &#187; Taking pirates prisoners</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-124539</link>
		<dc:creator>Pragmatic Euphony &#187; Taking pirates prisoners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-124539</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t perfect the first time around. When the INS Tabar claimed to have sunk a pirate mother vessel in Indian Ocean off the Somalian coast, it later turned out to be a Thai fishing trawler that had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t perfect the first time around. When the INS Tabar claimed to have sunk a pirate mother vessel in Indian Ocean off the Somalian coast, it later turned out to be a Thai fishing trawler that had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-124100</link>
		<dc:creator>mp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-124100</guid>
		<description>Could there be any truth in &lt;a href=&quot;http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-update-mother-ship-shrimp-boat-either-way-it%E2%80%99s-puree/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this? &lt;/a&gt;. Could it have really only been a Thai trawler illegally fishing there and mistakenly sunk by INS Tabar?

Is there any credible news source out there which is raising this question or is this maverick site the only one carrying it?

MP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could there be any truth in <a href="http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-update-mother-ship-shrimp-boat-either-way-it%E2%80%99s-puree/" rel="nofollow">this? </a>. Could it have really only been a Thai trawler illegally fishing there and mistakenly sunk by INS Tabar?</p>
<p>Is there any credible news source out there which is raising this question or is this maverick site the only one carrying it?</p>
<p>MP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaan</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123904</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123904</guid>
		<description>@Sanjay
Before calling me an &#039;LTTE lackey&#039; you need to brush up your history. Srilanka had deep distrust towards Tamil kingdoms for more than a thousand years and then towards India after Indian independence. It runs through their veins. That is the reason they supported Pakistan against India during 1971 war. Still they get the bulk of their military equipment and training from China and Pakistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sanjay<br />
Before calling me an &#8216;LTTE lackey&#8217; you need to brush up your history. Srilanka had deep distrust towards Tamil kingdoms for more than a thousand years and then towards India after Indian independence. It runs through their veins. That is the reason they supported Pakistan against India during 1971 war. Still they get the bulk of their military equipment and training from China and Pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandra</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123857</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123857</guid>
		<description>Nitin, you missed the most important part - leans over to stir his tea :) 

Chairboy was excellent!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitin, you missed the most important part &#8211; leans over to stir his tea <img src='http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Chairboy was excellent!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123855</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123855</guid>
		<description>Shaan, stop being such an LTTE lackey. This is a forum for Indian interests, not for Eelamist expansionism. Sri Lanka is certainly not a fanatical state and enjoys good relations with the entire spectrum of the international community. They&#039;re certainly not in the category of Pakistan, for example. Velupillai Prabhakaran is a ruthless megalomaniac who has assassinated a former Indian Prime Minister. The sooner that crook meets a terrible end, the better. And anybody who sympathizes with him can go join him, as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaan, stop being such an LTTE lackey. This is a forum for Indian interests, not for Eelamist expansionism. Sri Lanka is certainly not a fanatical state and enjoys good relations with the entire spectrum of the international community. They&#8217;re certainly not in the category of Pakistan, for example. Velupillai Prabhakaran is a ruthless megalomaniac who has assassinated a former Indian Prime Minister. The sooner that crook meets a terrible end, the better. And anybody who sympathizes with him can go join him, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaan</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123847</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123847</guid>
		<description>@Sanjay at No.6

The LTTE could do it if they want to do it as they control the north west, north and east coast of Srilanka. They also have big ocean going vessels that could serve as mother ships. Simply they don&#039;t want to indulge in such stupid acts as they would pit India against them. You must also know that even though they have a limited stock pile of chemical weapons, the LTTE has not used them against the public in Srilanka till now. The LTTE as an insurgent organization striving for a definitive political goal does not want to antagonize the civilized world by resorting to such acts.

On Sethusamudram project, I don&#039;t oppose it merely because it cuts through Ram&#039;s bridge. I oppose it because it is technically not feasible. No nation has dredged through the sea to make a passage. Experts say that the soil keeps moving and simply one time dredge will not do. We will have to periodically dredge which is not feasible. But unmindful of these concerns the DMK ministers want to do it because they are supposedly getting kickbacks out of it. A route that is feasible would cut through the land to make the passage and that is what has been done the world over right from the Suez canal. Sethusamudram would only add to the security of India because we need not go around the untrustworthy Srilankans who would be ready to inform our warship movements to the Chinese/Pakistanis in case of a conflict. They already helped the Pakis during 1971 and there is no guarantee that they will not do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sanjay at No.6</p>
<p>The LTTE could do it if they want to do it as they control the north west, north and east coast of Srilanka. They also have big ocean going vessels that could serve as mother ships. Simply they don&#8217;t want to indulge in such stupid acts as they would pit India against them. You must also know that even though they have a limited stock pile of chemical weapons, the LTTE has not used them against the public in Srilanka till now. The LTTE as an insurgent organization striving for a definitive political goal does not want to antagonize the civilized world by resorting to such acts.</p>
<p>On Sethusamudram project, I don&#8217;t oppose it merely because it cuts through Ram&#8217;s bridge. I oppose it because it is technically not feasible. No nation has dredged through the sea to make a passage. Experts say that the soil keeps moving and simply one time dredge will not do. We will have to periodically dredge which is not feasible. But unmindful of these concerns the DMK ministers want to do it because they are supposedly getting kickbacks out of it. A route that is feasible would cut through the land to make the passage and that is what has been done the world over right from the Suez canal. Sethusamudram would only add to the security of India because we need not go around the untrustworthy Srilankans who would be ready to inform our warship movements to the Chinese/Pakistanis in case of a conflict. They already helped the Pakis during 1971 and there is no guarantee that they will not do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123832</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123832</guid>
		<description>Nitin,

So if we&#039;re going to look after our own interests, let us not allow the sudden praise from others to go to our heads. The Indian Navy should be dedicated to safeguard Indian shipping, and if any hapless Chinese get hijacked then leave them to their fate. After all, the Chinese have helped to create this current piracy situation, through their rampant arms sales to feuding African factions.

India seems to be performing services for free, and getting nothing in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitin,</p>
<p>So if we&#8217;re going to look after our own interests, let us not allow the sudden praise from others to go to our heads. The Indian Navy should be dedicated to safeguard Indian shipping, and if any hapless Chinese get hijacked then leave them to their fate. After all, the Chinese have helped to create this current piracy situation, through their rampant arms sales to feuding African factions.</p>
<p>India seems to be performing services for free, and getting nothing in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123826</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123826</guid>
		<description>Sanjay,

The UNSC membership is beside the point. You become a great power by looking after your interests, no matter what people think. This doesn&#039;t require anyone to give you any title, seat or position---you can (and must) do this yourself. &quot;Khudi ko kar buland itna...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanjay,</p>
<p>The UNSC membership is beside the point. You become a great power by looking after your interests, no matter what people think. This doesn&#8217;t require anyone to give you any title, seat or position&#8212;you can (and must) do this yourself. &#8220;Khudi ko kar buland itna&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strengthening India&#8217;s naval presence off Somalia &#124; The Acorn</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123823</link>
		<dc:creator>Strengthening India&#8217;s naval presence off Somalia &#124; The Acorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123823</guid>
		<description>[...] success changes things. It was only a couple of months ago that Defence Minister A K Antony said that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] success changes things. It was only a couple of months ago that Defence Minister A K Antony said that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayuresh Gaikwad</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayuresh Gaikwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123821</guid>
		<description>Looks like the pirates were total jackasses! 

How else do you expect a naval warship armed with missles (even the Brahmos has been fitted on it!) to respond when you virtually challenge it to a duel? Obviously, the pirates had it once they challenged INS Tabar

BTW, I do not think there is any law that allows a warship to sink another one in a non-war scenario if there is no threat to it. If the pirates would have just stay put and said that they are not upto any harm, INS Tabar would have to ignore them according to international law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the pirates were total jackasses! </p>
<p>How else do you expect a naval warship armed with missles (even the Brahmos has been fitted on it!) to respond when you virtually challenge it to a duel? Obviously, the pirates had it once they challenged INS Tabar</p>
<p>BTW, I do not think there is any law that allows a warship to sink another one in a non-war scenario if there is no threat to it. If the pirates would have just stay put and said that they are not upto any harm, INS Tabar would have to ignore them according to international law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; India: Sinking A Pirate Ship</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123818</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; India: Sinking A Pirate Ship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123818</guid>
		<description>[...] Acorn comments on the incident of Indian Navy Ship Tabar sinking a pirate ship off the coast of Somalia: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Acorn comments on the incident of Indian Navy Ship Tabar sinking a pirate ship off the coast of Somalia: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123814</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123814</guid>
		<description>Furthermore, since India is providing all this security for the vital shipping lanes, then it&#039;s also appropriate to again be raising the issue of India being given a seat on the UN Security Council.

After all, if the Permanent Five are going to claim some exclusive privilege for their status on the UNSC, then let them provide the security for the shipping lanes, instead of India.

No obligation without representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, since India is providing all this security for the vital shipping lanes, then it&#8217;s also appropriate to again be raising the issue of India being given a seat on the UN Security Council.</p>
<p>After all, if the Permanent Five are going to claim some exclusive privilege for their status on the UNSC, then let them provide the security for the shipping lanes, instead of India.</p>
<p>No obligation without representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123803</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123803</guid>
		<description>Another thing - I wonder how this piracy would play into the hands of the Russians, by making the newly thawed Arctic passage the most viable route from East Asia to Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing &#8211; I wonder how this piracy would play into the hands of the Russians, by making the newly thawed Arctic passage the most viable route from East Asia to Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2008/11/19/ini-tabar-sinks-pirate-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-123800</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/?p=3190#comment-123800</guid>
		<description>This piracy is yet another reason why the Setusamudram canal project is a bad idea. Just imagine the havoc LTTE could cause if heavy shipping traffic passed within their reach.

Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/19/asia/pirates.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; on the piracy story

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piracy is yet another reason why the Setusamudram canal project is a bad idea. Just imagine the havoc LTTE could cause if heavy shipping traffic passed within their reach.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/19/asia/pirates.php" rel="nofollow">more</a> on the piracy story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
